National 12

General Boards => General National 12 chat => Topic started by: THG on 11 May 2006, 02:35

Title: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: THG on 11 May 2006, 02:35
 Just curious, last night managed to sail in big thunderstorm lots of lightening etc - had to retire too, after being in a nearly winning position 3 laps in  :'(  (smalll crew not too happy being out in all that wind / rain / flashes) - so is it any safer being struck by  lightening with a carbon or a tin rig??

Anyone knows what happens??

Kean


Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: John Murrell (Guest) on 11 May 2006, 04:14
Apart from a loud bang, burst eardrums, lots of frying, going blind you rely on The Holy Grail to protect you!!!!!!!!!

Sounds like you are enjoying the boat?

John
Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: THG on 11 May 2006, 04:34
John,  THG has had several visits to other places, Bristol (swimming), Avon (Swimming), Trent (drifting) and a few home sails.  Enjoying the boat and learning how to set up and get best out - last night we were going very well until.....

Kean
Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: Mikey C on 11 May 2006, 09:18
Either are not good - try and find a "buddy" with a taller mast than you - one that isnt wood...

Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: Jimbo42 on 11 May 2006, 09:52
Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: philipcosson on 13 May 2006, 09:05
On one of my tables for risk estimate it cites a 1:9100 risk of lightning strike. (US population). I'm assuming sailing in a thunderstorm raises this risk quite coniderably.

there are 2000 thunderstorms active at any given time arround the world. generaing 100 lightning strikes per second. a lightning bolt can be as much as 1 mile in advance of any clouds.

i would clear the water ASAP in a thunderstorm - and i'm not particularly risk averse.

Philip
Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: RogerBrisley on 13 May 2006, 10:42
Title: Re: Carbon or Tin in Thunderstorm
Post by: philipcosson on 14 May 2006, 08:04
afirmative to both points Roger!

Philip